16. Dec, 2018

Like other top ocean predators,  the sea otters presence helps to maintain a diverse community of animals and plants in the kelp forests. Otters eat sea urchins and other grazing animals such as crabs and abalones keeping them from devouring the kelp.  Once hunted to extinction for the fur trade, the southern  thick-haired sea otter  (Enhydra litris nereis) has had a slow road to recovery under more than a century of legal protections. Last year it even reached a number of almost 3200 species. The sea otter profited from the sea urchin boom along the  Californian coast, but now shows a jump in mortality that curtails their expansion. The reason is bites from great whites, who are also growing in number due to their pinniped food source expanding. Instead of preying on the otters (they don’t have the blubber of other sea mammals)  sharks are taking investigative bites, some of which cause severe injuries causing death

 A sea otter research program is carried out in Monterey Bay Sea Aquarium led by Michelle Staedler using data loggers to track their goings, and rescuing abandoned otters.  Because of the increased risk of shark bites, researchers as  Kerstin Wasson and Ron Eby are now exploring new shark-free habitats for the otters. One such area is  Elkhorn Slough, a major estuary system in Moss Landing that feeds into Monterey Bay. Although the swampy slough is not really a coastal area,  the otters so far seem to enjoy their new habitat where they also have more opportunities to stay on land. Captured abandoned sea otters from the Monterey coast are also released in Elkhorn Slough by Michelle Staedler and her team. 

Eelgrass beds in the Slough were being smothered by algae that grew unchecked on the leaves, absorbing the sunlight eelgrass needed for photosynthesis. Snails, slugs and other invertebrates would eat the film of algae, cleaning the grass and allowing it to get the sunlight it needs. The snails and slugs, however, tend to be devoured by the increasing number of crabs in the estuary,  which have few natural predators. Since the sea otter turned up (now counting around 150 individuals) and began feeding on the crabs  (see insert) the balance is now improving. The bay of the San Francisco is another area that Wasson and Eby are exploring as a future shark free habitat of the otters, a place where many sea otters lived in the past until they were killed by fur hunters.

Sources:

https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/environment/article219016110.htmlSea otters

https://futureoftheocean.wordpress.com/2015/06/03/sea-otter-insights-monitoring-apex-predators-in-elkhorn-slough/

https://www.hcn.org/articles/sea-otter-populations-increase-but-shark-bites-stall-range-growth

 

23. Oct, 2018

The  cuttlefish  (Sepia) belongs to the family of Sepiida,  that in turn are part of the Cephalopoda which also include squids octopuses and nautiluses. Cuttlefish (see also my earlier Blog) form an enormous variety of species of which some, like Sepia officinalis and Sepia elegans, have -sadly enough- gained great popularity as appetizers and tasty entries on dinner tables. Sepia has a  cuttlebone used for buoyancy control. They feed themselves by extending two hidden feeding tentacles, which snag prey and pull it back to its strong beak. When Sepia mates the male grabs the female by the face and inserts a specialized tentacle into an opening near the females’ mouth and then inserts sperm sacks. The male then guards the female until the eggs are laid a few hours later. 

Giant Cuttlefish  (picture taken by Dave Abbott)

 The reputation of Sepia as ‘ chameleon of the sea’  is based on their unique capacity to rapidly change color by controlling pigment cells in their skin. Their skin functions like an extended brain, a bit like the eight arms of the Octopus, with two-thirds of its nerve cells located in the nerve cords of its arms (see my earlier Blog on Octopus). But in Sepia, the brain is reflected in its pigment carrying cells in the skin. These chromatophores produce colors varying between orange, red, yellow, brown or black. They are like color pixels on a computer screen,  but instead of a computer program their skin cells are controlled by motor neurons in the brain, that in turn activate muscles around the chromatophores. The muscles constantly expand and contract in a complex choreography in direct response to the activity of motor neurons, which is displayed in rapid changes in the color of the chromatophores. 

The color changes reflect the inner state of the cuttlefish. They may mirror certain  ‘emotions’  like fear (for predators),  sexual attraction (spotting a potential partner),  anger (spotting a rival) or when using camouflage by mimicking the color seagrass of coral. The mating ritual of the Australian giant cuttlefish is particularly impressive with respect to color changes.

Groups of cuttlefish use complex codes, changing rapidly in often synchronous patterns of pigment changes reflecting processes of social communication, of which the meaning still remains a mystery for biological  science.

Sam Reiter and his team from The Max-Planck Institute for Brain research, recently published an article in the journal Nature, describing in more detail the properties of cells in the cuttlefish skin, and neurons extending from the brain that control color changes. The team monitored changes in the state of the color-changing cells in living cuttlefish with high-resolution cameras, which allowed them to track the activity of tens of thousands of neurons simultaneously, for the first time. They also used electrical stimulation of muscles of the mantle of a small number of cuttlefish to produce artificial color changes and track motor units (nerve cells that make a muscle contract).  Analysis of the pattern dynamics and rules that govern the development of skin pattern, showed that new pixels of the chromatophores (that changed recently)  were mostly yellow and more mature pixels black.

 

25. Jan, 2018

Green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) migrate long distances between feeding and nesting sites; and some swim more than 2,600 kilometers  to reach their spawning grounds. Female turtles can store sperm from a single mating for the entire nesting season and males visit the breeding areas every year, attempting to mate.  The eggs are round and white, and about 4-5 cm in diameter and hatch  in the sand. The hatchlings remain buried until they all emerge together at night after around two months.Then they rush instinctively over the beach to the waterline. Nests may contain up to 200 eggs. But only few turtles reach adulthood in the  oceans where they are a favorite prey  for  various predators. The highest rate of predation occurs in the water within the first 30–60 min of swimming as they pass through the cordon of predators found in the shallow water surrounding natal beaches

Left: Top: two separate nesting sites  of green sea turtles along the Great Barrier Reef. ( adapted from **). 

Along the east coast of Australia female and male green turtles mate in the vicinity of their nesting beach.  The Northern Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is home to one of the largest green turtle populations in the world, with an estimated female population size of around 200,000 nesting females. Furthermore, two genetically distinct breeding populations of green turtles are found at the opposite ends of the Great Barrier Reef: the southern Great Barrier Reef (sGBR) stock and the northern Great Barrier Reef (nGBR) stock, with virtually no nesting occurring along the middle part of the GBR (see picture left). On the average 80% of the turtles at the GBR are female and 20% male.

Sex determination  in turtles  Reptiles are related to birds and  have  roamed the earth for more than 300 million years. Most reptiles including sea turtles do not have sex chromosomes. Instead, sex of newborns depends on temperature-dependent sex determination  (TSD). TSD relates to temperatures experienced during the middle third of embryonic development. It was already known to hold for the green as well as the painted turtle (Chrysemys pica)  populations in areas where cooler summers always  produced mostly male, and warmer summers mostly female  turtle offspring (see Janzen *). Janzen also found that nests of the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina)  incubated at 26°C produced 100% males, at 30°C produced 100% females, and at 28°C produced equal numbers of females and males.

How does TSD work? Pivotal temperatures are species-specific temperature ranges in which males and females are produced in equal number. The pivotal temperature is heritable but only a few degrees Celsius  are needed to drastically alter this ratio to  produce 100% males or 100% females spans. It still remains unclear how the developing embryo detects a thermal stimulus that apparently directs its sexual fate. Microscopic studies of the embryo gonads have established  that steroid hormones could start the process once the temperature change is detected.  In some turtles the critical temperature-dependent component appears to be synthesis of the enzyme aromatase, which converts androgens, such as testosterone, into estrogens. At higher temperatures, increased aromatase activity produces more estrogens, which biases the sex ratio toward more females. 

TSD and fitness A common pattern of TSD in turtles is that warmer temperatures favor development of female and colder temperatures development of male  hatchlings. This pattern would make sense from the point of view of  natural selection if females  gain more in lifetime fitness by developing in higher water temperatures compared to male turtles. Which would create a stronger tendency of females than males to avoid cooler beaches. For example, warmer temperatures may lead to a stronger greater adult body size, which has a greater effect on female fecundity than on male fertility. In line with this theory Janzen reported that hatchlings from the all-male and all-female producing temperatures had significantly higher first-year survivorship than did consexuals from the incubation temperature that produced both sexes from the incubation temperature that produced both sexes.

Climate warming and GBR nesting Species with TSD have existed for millions of years and coped with the selective pressures of a changing environment through adaptive changes of heritable traits. However, it is unlikely that these traits would evolve rapidly enough to keep pace with the current rate of climatic warming.  A recent Australian/American  study carried out on 441 green turtles of the GBR (**) has shed more light on the possible impact of climate change on changing sex ratio’s of the green turtles colonies of  the GBR. Blood and tissue samples were collected from the turtles to determine sex, steroid hormones and DNA. The study found a strong sex bias depending on the location of the GBR where eggs hatched. In the cooler southern GBR nesting beaches there was a moderate female sex bias (65%–69% female) in turtles, but  turtles that originated from  northern GBR nesting beaches were extremely female-biased (99.1% of juvenile, 99.8% of sub-adults, and 86.8% of adult-sized turtles; see also figure above, lower panel). The study further indicated that northern GBR green turtle locations  have  been producing primarily females for more than two decades and that the proportion of females has increased in recent decades.

Conclusion With average global temperature predicted to increase 2.6C by 2100, many sea turtle populations are in danger of high egg mortality and female-only off-springs. A high female bias  as such might not create a problem, since only few males are needed to fertilize an entire colony of females. But an extreme female bias would create a problem in finding a male at all, and/or  lead to genetic impoverishment due to lack of genetic variation in a relatively small group of males. Visits of breeding males from other populations  might mitigate extreme feminization, but this would  be less likely  to occur at the northern GBR,  where visits of male turtles from the south are less likely to occur.

Extreme incubation temperatures not only produce female-only hatchlings but also cause high mortality of developing clutches. A some beaches in  Florida the strain of surviving at elevated temperatures and resulting heat stress seems to  weaken the hatchlings and  slow down their  run to reach the shoreline in time. Researchers are  now exploring plans to cool the nests, like using shade cloth or putting water on top of them.

Sources

*Janzen, F.J. (1994). Climate change and temperature-dependent sex determination in reptiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7487–7490.

Janzen,F.J. (1995) Experimental evidence for the evolutionary significance of temperature-dependent sex determination, Evolution 49 864 – 873.

**Jensen, M.P. et al. (2018), Environmental Warming and Feminization of One of the Largest Sea Turtle Populations in the World.  Current Biology 28, 154–159

***Spencer, R. J.; Janzen, F. J. (2014). "A novel hypothesis for the adaptive maintenance of environmental sex determination in a turtle"Proceedings of the Royal Society B281

 Hake, L. & O'Connor, C. (2008) Genetic mechanisms of sex determination. Nature Education 1(1):25

Warner DA, Shine R (2008). "The adaptive significance of temperature-dependent sex determination in a reptile"Nature. 451(7178): 566–568. . 

 Pen, Ido,  et al.  (2010). "Climate-driven population divergence in sex-determining systems". Nature. 468: 436–439. 

Valenzuela, Nicole; Fredric J. Janzen (2001). "Nest-site philopatry and the evolution of temperature-dependent sex determination" (PDF). Evolutionary Ecology Research. 3: 779–794. Retrieved 7 December 2011

Mrosovsky, N., and Yntema, C.L. (1980). Temperature dependence of sexual differentiation in sea turtles: implications for conservation practices. Biol

8. Jan, 2018

Luckily our world is still  full  of birds and insects that produce a variety of  sounds. Even the sounds of some insects are pleasant  to listen to. Like the songs of  crickets  and  the Cicadas or Cigales of the Provence in France. The male cicadas can produce exceptionally loud sounds by using two small membranes under each wing  that vibrate rapidly when pulled by tiny muscles. The male abdomen is largely hollow, and acts as a sound box, similar to a cello instrument.  On hot summer days whole groups of males congregate in the plane- or pine trees and synchronize their sound to establish chorusing centers that fill entire streets or market squares. The reason why is to attract the females. And perhaps also to entertain the summerguests having  lunch under the pine trees with a  glas of  cold vin rosee  within reach.

..Oops, almost forgot that this is about fishes not cicadas!  In contrast  with birds and  insects  the reputation of fishes is  not mainly based on the sounds that they make. Nevertheless, many fishes in the Atlantic or tropical oceans create different types of sounds using different mechanisms and for different reasons.  Research of sound production in fish is still in its infancy. But scientists using recorded fish vocalizations with underwater microphones have  identified many fish species that make amazing sounds, either as individuals or in groups.  Based on this evidence, it now seems that hundreds of species of marine (and probably also freshwater) fishes are capable of generating acoustic signals

Left: Upper figure: the sound producing mechanism of the catfish in the base of  its left pectoral fin (source **). Lower figure: swimbladder (SB), sonic muscle (SM) and  sonic nerve (SN) in the northern searobin (adapted from ***)

Active sound production in fish often depends on time and space. Many fishes become ‘talkative’ in the breeding season, following a seasonal and/or diurnal cycle.  In contrast with the sophisticated sonar sounds of  marine mammals like whales and dolphins, the vocabulary of fish species is limited, and meant to communicate gross information. It could signal danger, distress, competition or attracting a female. Fish vocalizations can take a wide variety of forms, including clicks, purrs, grunts, groans, growls or barks. They  may be intentionally produced as signals to predators or competitors, to attract mates or as territorial display. 

There are globally  two ways in which fishes make sounds. One is  stridulation:  striking or rubbing together skeletal components. Crickets use stridulation, as well as marine catfish and seahorses. For example seahorse species  make  clicking and/or snapping sounds by rubbing together  bony edges of the skull and  the coronet, a crown-shaped plate on the its head. These sounds are possibly amplified by the swim bladder. Some marine catfishes (Arius felis and Bagre marinus) have specialized pectoral fin spines that make a stridulatory squeaking sound. They do so by  rubbing the base of the pectoral fin spine against the pectoral girdle (see picture above). The sound can even be heard at the surface by anglers. Trigger fishes can produce drumroll sounds that result from alternate sweeping movements of the right and left pectoral fins, which push a system of three scutes (bony scales) that are forced against the swimbladder wall. Other fishes use their  swim bladder to produce sounds. A muscle attached to the swim bladder called the sonic muscle contracts and relaxes in a rapid sequence (see picture above). This action causes the swim bladder to vibrate and produce a low-pitched drumming sound. Examples are the goliath grouper, black drum, toad fish and silver peak. Not to forget the oyster toadfish, that is able to contract its muscle at a rate of 200 times a second. The  swim bladder can either function as the actual sound generator itself, or as an amplifier for sounds generated by other body parts including e.g. the pectoral girdle, fin rays, various other bones or tooth in front of the mouth.

Along coral reefs of the Red Sea clownfish, triggerfish, damselfish and angelfish often make loud clicks, drum rolls, or ‘pangs’ during agonistic interactions, in distress and or when divers get too close to their territory  (see audio gallery).  Other  male fishes, mostly found in the greater oceans or their coastlines  are known to create  very  strange and often very loud sounds. The sounds mostly serve to attract females in the mating or spawning seasons.  Here follow examples of some notorious sound producing species.

Catfish   Catfish can become very large and are found in  the sea, coastal water and rivers. The squeeker catfish  (Synodontis eupterus)  make a  croaking sound by rubbing the spines located in their pectoral fins into grooves on their shoulders as shown in the picture above. Talking catfish (Platydoras armatulus) can produce sound in two ways—by vibrating their swim bladder or by vibrating their pectoral fin spines in their sockets.

Oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau)   is a froglike fish from the  family  of Batrachoididae.  The fish has a distinctive "foghorn" sound used by males to attract females in the mating season (audio gallery and  toadfish song). Males make nests, and then attract females by "singing", that is, by releasing air by contracting muscles on their swim bladders.  Attracted by the foghorn sound, the female comes into the nest, lays eggs, and then leaves.The sound can be loud enough to be clearly audible from the surface. 

Plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus)  is bioluminescent. The plainfin midshipman is another type of toadfish, found off the west coast of North America from Alaska to Baja California. During the mating season the male midshipman hums—sometimes for long periods—by hitting his swim bladder with his sonic muscle. His humming serves to attract a female. Once she deposits her eggs, the midshipman resumes humming to attract another female to his nest. The male guards the eggs until they hatch. Typically these fishes are nocturnal and bury themselves in sand or mud in the intertidal zone during the day.

The black drum (Pogonias cromis) is a black or greyish fish that lives in the brackish water found in areas such as estuaries. The young fish have black stripes  that  fade as the fish matures. Black drums are mainly bottom feeders.  Adults can become very big and may weigh over a hundred pounds. Black drums become very noisy during the mating season  (audio gallery). The low pitched sounds that they produce travel long distances. Again,  males produce the sounds to attract females. The fish use their swim bladder and sonic muscle to create the vocalizations. Sometimes black drum  mating calls are conducted by the ground and the seawalls and then enter nearby houses on the shore.

Herring communicate with each other by expelling gas from the anal area, producing bubbles and a high-pitched sound. Inventive researchers have called this sound production a FRT (Fast Repetitive Tick). Both the Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) and the Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) produce FRTs. The fish swallow air from the water surface and then store it in the swim bladder, so the air is not the result of digesting food. During the night, in darkness and when surrounded by other herring, air is released through the anal duct. The purpose of the collective FRT sounds may be to ensure that the fish stay close together.

Corvina The physical act of reproduction can be a noisy affair for many fishes, but beats all records for the Gulf Corvina (Cynoscion othonopterus). Every spring, millions of these large gray fish migrate to the Colorado River delta and sync their spawning to the tides and the phases of the moon. The magnitude of their sounds (produced by rapidly beating their swim bladders with the sonic muscles) can become even deafening during simultaneous chorusing of males within the larger spawning aggregation.  These sounds  can even extend up to 27 km distance along the main channel of the Delta and include 1.5 million individuals during a single spawning period. At the loudest the sound level of the chorusing fishes was more than 150 decibels  (see  corvina). The corvina is endemic to the Northern Gulf of California and faces imminent risk of species extinction due to overfishing of its spawning aggregation,  and regulations that allow overfishing to persist*. In the spawning season local fisherman find it easy to locate the fishes by their sounds even from their small boats. With one net they often catch hundreds of corvina’s in a few minutes.

Sources and links

*Erisman BE, Rowell TJ. 2017 A sound worth saving: acoustic characteristics of a massive fish spawning aggregation. Biol. Lett. 13: 20170656

Popper AN, Fay RR, Platt C, Sand O. 2003 Sound detection mechanisms and capabilities of teleostfishes. In Sensory processing in aquatic environments(eds SP Collin, NJ Marshall), pp. 3–28. New York,NY: Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

Ben Wilson, Robert S. Batty and Lawrence M. Dill 2003. Pacific and Atlantic herring produce burst pulse sounds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.) 2003

**E. Parmentier et al. Functional study of the pectoral spine stridulation mechanism in different mochokid catfishes. Journal of Experimental Biology 2010 213: 1107-1114
 
Raick Xavier et al. Sound production mechanism in triggerfish (Balistidae): a synapomorphy
Journal of Experimental Biology 2017.  Published 23 November 2017
 
Tyack PL. 1998 Acoustic communication under the sea. In Animal acoustic communication (eds SL Hopp, MJ Owren, CS Evans), pp. 163–220. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
 
***Martin A. Connaughton  Sound generation in the searobin (Prionotus carolinus), a fish with alternate sonic muscle contraction. Journal of Experimental Biology 2004 207: 1643-1654
 

 Discovery of Sound in the Sea. University of Rhode Island and Inner Space Center. http://dosits.org/galleries/audio-gallery/fishes/ 

http://www.sfu.ca/biology/faculty/dill/publications/,FRTing_herring_Wilson_et_al.pdf (accessed August 26, 2017).

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/12/one-loudest-underwater-sounds-made-animal-you-wouldn-t-expect

https://owlcation.com/stem/Fish-That-Make-Sounds-Purrs-Grunts-Hums-and-Hoots

http://www.fishbase.org/manual/English/PDF/FB_Book_KKaschner_Sounds_RF_JG.pdf

4. Dec, 2017

The whale shark (Rhincodon typus) is one of the many shark species I have never encountered. Perhaps one day when I am done with the Bahamian sharks (will I ever?), I shall cross the Atlantic to visit these gentle plankton gulping giants at Islas Mujeres.  During the summer months hundreds of whale sharks gather just north of the island in a seven mile radius to take advantage of the plankton rich waters created by the joining of the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea.

Left:  The region behind the gills of whale sharks (above) exhibits suitable variation in spot pattern to enable individual recognition using image-matching software (below: see Arzoumanian et al. 2005).

Whale sharks have recently been upgraded from vulnerable to endangered under the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.  There are still numerous reports of individuals being killed for food, including having their fins removed for soup. Their characteristics – docility, being the largest of all extant sharks, and tendency to aggregate seasonally at several accessible locations worldwide – have encouraged ecotourism and citizen-science opportunities, but also mean they can easily be targeted by fisheries in jurisdictions where they are not afforded protection.

Adult’s whale sharks grow slowly and only reach sexual maturity when they are 30 years  old, with their maximal age varying between 70 and 100 years.   It seems  that nobody has yet seen  whale sharks mating or a female giving birth to her pups. A  female species  captured in 1996 appeared to have  around 300 pups  in her womb each about 40 cm long. There are several  whale shark aggregation sites  -or hotspots- spread over the world  such as the Philippines, Islas Mujeres in Mexico, Belize, South Africa, Mozambique,  Qatar and the Gulf States, Galapagos Islands and the Maldives.

Still little is known about the whale sharks migratory habits and habitats. A recent paper in  Biomagazine* however described a large scale project of Australian researchers called  EcoOcean. Central in the project is the  Wildbook for whale sharks:  a visual database of whale shark  encounters of individually catalogued whale sharks. Here people can assist with whale shark research by submitting photos and sighting data. Since 1992 the  library has collected around 30.000 pictures of whale sharks over 57 countries, many taken by  snorkelers  and scuba divers visiting one of their hotspots.  This included in particular Ningaloo Reef and other sites along the along the extended Western Australian coastline. The ever growing data-base caused the number of 14 known hotspots to increase to 20. Top four sightings of whale sharks were from the locations Mexico-Atlantic, Western Australia (Ningaloo Marine Park), Mozambique and the Philippines (e.g. Cebu)

The project has contributed to a  better understanding  of the  wale sharks mobility  as well as their regular habitats.  An unique aspect of the project is that creation of the  picture library was realized with the help of Citizen Science: pictures taken by snorkelers or  scuba divers while visiting popular sites of whale sharks.  The technique used to identify the sharks in the EcoOcean project  is  straightforward, and  based on pattern recognition software using the white dot patterns behind the  gills of the whale shark as  a standard (see picture above). This particular area on the shark’s skin needs to be photographed in the correct orientation. Participants also upload, when possible, other relevant sighting information for storage and future analysis, includ­ing sighting location, sex, and estimated total length

As noticed in my earlier Blog,  using natural  body markings is  an alternative and  shark-friendly way to  identify individual sharks, although it does not allow real time tracking of the shark. But it is  much cheaper than tagging of sharks with telemetric devices, a more invasive method that can only  be applied on  a relatively small number of species. An it also allows to search for  individual sharks by comparing its unique pattern with a larger data base (somewhat like a fingerprint of a foreign visitor collected by the US customs at the airport).  Another interesting side of this method is that UW photographers can contribute to collect such a data base. 

The first  whale shark that entered the library  was a wale shark called  Stumpy,  because of   the unusual shape of the upper lobe of its caudal fin. Stumpy’s unique patterning was later identified  in 69 photographs submitted to the library between 1995 and 2016. During these two decades, Stumpy’s  total length  remained relatively unchanged at 7.40 m which closely matches  the 7.44 m estimates calculated from lengths reported by citizen scientists between 2008 and 2015. Photographic evidence also showed that Stumpy’s claspers had become elongated for the first time in 1998 and 2001, respectively – an indication that they had attained maturity*.  Other whale sharks  from the data base  are   A-103, a faithful customer of  Ningaloo reef  in Australia  estimated to be about 21 years, and BZ-011  that has been spotted over 5 years along the coast of Belize, but nowhere else. A surprising exception was A-424  who  showed far more mobility. After  been identified  first in Australian waters,  she was spotted later  in  Indonesia about 2.700 km  further to the north-west.  Smallest species were found in Indonesia (4 meter)  largest in Galapagos (11 meter). In general, long distance migratory routes were  extremely rare. However this did not  rule out  the possibility that the date base  might cover only a small part of the world population, or that  the  identified whales sharks had  visited other  more remote and  unknown locations.

Taking these cinsiderations in account,  Citizen Science  seems to have demonstrated that:

-Whale  sharks are far less migratory than other shark species (like for example tiger sharks ak)

-Exhibit a high degree of site fidelity  with longevity conservatively estimated to be at least 80 years

-Males and  females are strongly segregated with a preference for their own distinct habitats (in accordance with other predator sharks ak). For example  at the Galapagos, 99% of sexed individuals were female while  in Maldives and South Africa, only 9.43% and 9.60%, respectively, of the sexed whale sharks that were submitted were females

 

Sources and links

*Norman B. et al. (2017) undersea constellations: the global biology of an endangered marine megavertebrate further informed through citizen science  Bioscience xx: 1–15.   Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American institute of Biological Sciences 

Hsu HH, Joung SJ, Hueter RE, and Liu KM. 2014. Age and growth of the whale shark (Rhincodon typus) in the north-western Pacific. Mar Freshwater Res 65: 1145–54.

Norman B and Stevens J. 2007. Size and maturity status of the whale shark (Rhincodon typus) at Ningaloo Reef in Western Australia. Fish Res 84: 81–86

Arzoumanian Z, Holmberg J, and Norman B. 2005. An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. J Appl Ecol 42: 999–1011.

Davies TK, Stevens G, Meekan MG, et al. 2013. Can citizen science monitor whale-shark aggregations? Investigating bias in mark–recapture modeling using identification photographs sourced from the public. Wildlife Res 39: 696–704

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.1418/pdf

http://photoid.whaleshark.org